Hello, this is David.
Now i have one question 「 Regarding the influence due to ResUsage setting change」want to confirm
Problem Description:
We received an inquiry from DCS to inquire about channel utilization rate. (Among the current 1.6 GB channels, how much are you using ?)
If it is a ResUsageShst table, the communication volume of the channel is understood, due to the setting of Shst is not ON at present, so could not get the information.
Please check the following contents.
· Is there any way to check the channel traffic volume except the ResUsageShst table?
⇒ Since Shst currently set OFF state, please teach if there is a way to acquire similar information in others.
· Please tell us the effect of turning ON Shst setting.
⇒ it is production environment currently in operation, is it necessary to restart in order to reflect the setting?
How much CPU load will increase, and how much capacity will increase. Would you please give me some advice.
Thanks in advance
Best regards
David
Solved! Go to Solution.
Added overhead should be very small with normal ResUsage intervals (accumulate every 1 minute, write log row for each host interface every 10 minutes) and space occupied by the log records should be small.
If the nodes containing your channel interfaces are not used for TCP/IP ("network") connections, then you could use node-level ResUsageSpma data. If those nodes support both channel and TCP/IP traffic (so "host" traffic at the node level is both channel and network combined), then you could at least get an upper bound.
Added overhead should be very small with normal ResUsage intervals (accumulate every 1 minute, write log row for each host interface every 10 minutes) and space occupied by the log records should be small.
If the nodes containing your channel interfaces are not used for TCP/IP ("network") connections, then you could use node-level ResUsageSpma data. If those nodes support both channel and TCP/IP traffic (so "host" traffic at the node level is both channel and network combined), then you could at least get an upper bound.
Hi dear Fred, thanks for your advice.
Will use your advice to be solution.
best regards
David